Call of Duty: World at War (360) on Raptr

Call of Duty: World at War (360)

  • Playing
  • Accomplishments
  • One-click join
  • Auto-update
Activision
Treyarch
2008-11-11
Shooter, 1st Person
Mature
Sign in to rate this game
Average of 759 ratings: 4 stars
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Call of Duty: World at War (360)

Call of Duty: World at War throws out the rulebook of war to transform WWII combat through a new enemy, new tactics and more »an uncensored experience of the climatic battles that gripped a generation. As U.S. Marines and Russian soldiers, players will employ new features like cooperative gameplay, and weapons such as the flamethrower in the most chaotic and cinematically intense experience to date. « less

Game Icon for Call of Duty: World at War (360)
Metacritic: 84
15,158 Players 418,241 Hours

Reviews

141 total See all reviews

Liked it

vashkey
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Call of Duty World at War can best be described as Call of Duty 4 in World War 2. It play almost exactly like Call of Duty 4. The most notable differences being that addition of Beyonets, the return of vehicle combat(or just tanks, should I say) and if course a different set of weapons. There isnt an over welming amount of change or anything, but it's different enough.

World At War is on par if not a little better looking than Call of Duty 4. Not only that but…
Nov 15 2009 ·

Didn't like it

Wheatious
  • 1
This game SUCKS
Nov 20 2009 ·

More reviews

alostsandwich
  • 1
  • 2
horrible game, i didnt put it as 1 star because this game included 2 player campaign.
Nov 15 2009 ·
awddsm
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Alright for a shoot'em up, not much into a major story line though.
Nov 11 2009 ·
Balzo93
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Call of duty, World at War is a great game. It is a great addition to the franchise and certinatly packs a punch when it comes to multiplayer and co-op. the campaign in this FPS is fun and very action packed. the only critisism i have is that it can get quite repetetive and many of the levels follow simular patterns. Some of the environments featured in the campaign are awsome. The player will travel to many places from the dark makin atoll environments in Japan to the polluted ruins…
Nov 4 2009 ·
Max Limitz
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Not as good as COD4, but the maps create a variation if you are bored with the COD4 maps. Campaign can be played cooperatively. Multiplayer maps have a lot of bugs.
Nov 4 2009 ·
dheat08
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The best Call of Duty yet WaW has a great campaign and an even better multiplayer experience. Nazi Zombies is fun but only when you play with you friends on Live
Oct 27 2009 ·
ronnie99582
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Good game but it will be better for game owners not to put old school stuff next time they create the game.
Oct 26 2009 ·
FonkiBot3000
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Fine game from beggining to end. The mode that I loved was the Nazi Zombies mode.
Oct 26 2009 ·
SpartanG01
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
I love World at War. I hate WWI/II games. It's a love hate thing for me. The gameplay is solid, almost perfect. The engine runs as smoothly as ever. The customization only gets better but the grind is harder and less interesting than CoD 4 and less rewarding in my opinion. I also don't like looking at wooden weapons anymore.
Oct 12 2009 ·
Login to add a review
Sign in and review!

Games in this Series

Latest Headlines

48 total See all news

Game Activity Feed

First | Prev | | Last
  • Nov 20

    Added by 1 person.

  • 13 people played this game for 23 hours.

  • Ouch. Looks like Wheatious really didn't like Call of Duty: World at War.

    • Call of Duty: World at War
      1
      This game SUCKS

  • Nov 19

    Added by 2 people.

  • 219 people played this game for 265 hours.

  • Added by 22 people.

  • 13 people played this game for 22 hours.

  • Nov 18

    Added by 3 people.

  • Added by 29 people.

  • 5 people played this game for 10 hours.

RSS feed for Call of Duty: World at War (360)
 
  • Raptr Master